Reconsidering Judicial Finality: Why the Supreme Court Is Not the Last Word on the Constitution
I will be using this book for:

Reconsidering Judicial Finality: Why the Supreme Court Is Not the Last Word on the Constitution

by Louis Fisher

Law Constitutional Law Political Science
1 Star 2 Star 3 Star 4 Star 5 Star
0.0 out of 5 stars (0 ratings)

Louis Fisher examines the assumption that the Supreme Court is the final word on the Constitution. Focusing on judicial finality and constitutional interpretation, this book considers the scope of the Court’s authority and invites readers to rethink how constitutional meaning is determined.

About This Book

Reconsidering Judicial Finality examines the idea that the Supreme Court is the final authority on the Constitution.

Louis Fisher considers the relationship between judicial decisions and constitutional interpretation.

The book explores the limits of judicial finality and the possibility that constitutional meaning may extend beyond the Court’s conclusions.

It offers a focused contribution to discussions of constitutional law, judicial power, and the structure of American government.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to review this book!


Write a Review
I will be using this book for: